Just latest act in farce

Nonis firing: Lamentable handling

Ed Willes, The Province

Published: Tuesday, April 15, 2008

There are a number of questions raised by the firing of Dave Nonis but, while much remains unclear, there's one which now hangs over this franchise like a large, dark cloud: Given the Aquilini family's track record, and given what's just happened to Nonis, is there a competent hockey man out there who'll work for the Canucks?

Francesco Aquilini pulled the trigger on Dave Nonis as Canucks GM Monday.

Francesco Aquilini pulled the trigger on Dave Nonis as Canucks GM Monday.

Photograph by : Gerry Kahrmann, Province, Files

ARTICLE TOOLS

Font:
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

In light of the last three and a half years, this is a fair and reasonable question. The Aquilinis, one supposes, are qualified to do many things -- build condos, sell condos, sell more condos -- but they're as qualified to run a hockey team as they are to perform open-heart surgery. Since they took over the Canucks, they've also demonstrated that time and time again, and the Nonis fiasco is simply the latest act in an ongoing farce.

"I couldn't feel more sorry for [Nonis]," said Brian Burke, the Anaheim Ducks' GM, Nonis's closest friend and an interesting character in this drama. "He will be OK and he will make his mark on this game. But this is his first experience with that silent sniper that gets all of us and it's a crappy part of this job."

It also couldn't have been handled more crappily by the Aquilinis but, at this stage, what would you expect?

Nonis's firing seems to be a panic move based on the Canucks' late-season collapse. The former GM believed he and the Aquilinis were on the same page when the organization refused to pay the big prices demanded for the most coveted players at the trade deadline.

Apparently, the brothers have since changed their minds.

But this is also part of a larger pattern of impulsive, erratic leadership which has haunted the Canucks since the Aquilinis appeared on the scene.

When Burke was fired following the '03-'04 season, for example, the brothers hadn't officially taken over the franchise, but they were kept in the loop by Orca Bay CEO Stan McCammon and the firing was made with their approval.

They also believed Nonis was the man to lead the organization forward -- you may remember the ridiculous story leaked at the time that Burke was fired because Orca Bay was deathly afraid they were going to lose Nonis.

Again, it seems the Aquilinis have since had a change of heart about the future of the organization, but the fun doesn't stop there.

Speculation became rampant Monday night that the move would clear the way for, ta-da, Burke's return to Vancouver and, all things considered, that story is just goofy enough to have some merit.

If you're laying odds, however, Burke has about a 20-per-cent chance of returning to Vancouver. Yes, he still has a great deal of affection for this city and yes, his wife, CBC's Jennifer Mathers, still has a career here.

But a lot of things would have to change before Burke came back. And that's because the Aquilinis have left the distinct impression the Canucks are being run as a business investment whose sole purpose is to make money and not to win the Stanley Cup.

When Burke was fired, for instance, one of the senior management positions in the hockey department was never filled. Both Nonis and Steve Tambellini moved up a spot and what used to be a three-man operation became a two-man team, which saved a fairly hefty salary.

Francesco Aquilini also thought it would be a keen idea if he served as the team's president in the first season after the lockout and, when that didn't work out, the brothers relented and hired a professional in Chris Zimmerman.

Want more?

Well, Nonis and head coach Alain Vigneault didn't have a great deal of NHL experience when they were hired, which meant they weren't expensive. The Canucks' coaching staff features one man who came to Vancouver with meaningful NHL experience, associate coach Rick Bowness.

This year the Canucks were also under the cap all season and, given the way this franchise has been supported by this market, that is extraordinary.

So what does all that add up to? This season the Canucks missed the playoffs by three points. Would have one $2-million player made up that difference? How about another solid hockey man in the front office? How about an experienced coach?

We may never know but, today, we know a good man lost his job, and the pity here is Nonis couldn't fire the owner.

ewilles@png.canwest.com

 
 
 
 
 

your comments
Nucks Fan
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 10:12 AM
When the Canucks gain a 2 goal advantage and then decide to sit back and let the other team come at them (like they did 2 or 3 times down the stretch), it shows a lack of motivation to continue with what had been working or a change in strategy by the coach. The coach should obviously be at fault and I hope to see Alain fired next. Nonis may have been a nice guy, but the season needs to be judged on results and potential. The Canucks were not in a rebuilding year as the Oilers were and completely fell on their face. Nonis has done nothing in his tenure and doesn't seem poised or experienced enough to pull off the deals that this team needs. Had been able to land Thornton when he was available, Forsberg, Hossa, or Jokinen he would have started to prove himself; but since the Luongo trade was a given, you could say his legacy will be Pettinger! Good Riddence Nonis!!
john n
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 11:02 AM
good start, don't stop there, shake it up, time for a major overhaul
Andy
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 11:40 AM
Ed Willes fails to mention that while the Canucks finished 2 points out, they were actually 11th in the West behind Edmonton and Chicago. Nonis may not have been able to pull the trigger at the deadline but what about the previous 5 months? It wasn't like it was a big secret in September that the Canucks couldn't score. The bottom line is Nonis didn't succeed in a results based industry and Ed Willes can't seem to understand that. Thank God Ed Willes doesn't own this team because for someone who apparently has the inside edge, he sure misses the boat on many topics.
MGH
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 11:46 AM
Absolutely spot on, imo. Nonis deserved another year (or 1/2 season at least) to work with the new cap space and move ahead with his map for the franchise. I supported his decision not to trade away assets for a rental - that would have been a bad move for the long term. Maybe the Acquilinis' have made a similar move in handling the situation. But there are always hungry people looking to get back in the game as a GM, so who knows?
Jack
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 11:47 AM
Nonsense. Aquilini acted decisively by firing a gross incompetent that had no business even being a GM. Nonis was with a losing organization long before Aquilini took over and dumb Dave did nothing to change it. Anyone with half-a-brain could see the team would go no where with him at the helm. Nonis was more interested in throwing draft picks away for washed-up players like Weinrich (Nonis' old college buddy) than building a team. How many picks were lost to Carney, Weinrich, Smolinski, et al none of whom stayed with the Canucks. Nonis failures to address holes in the line up were ridiculous. At his postmortem conference to make his excuses for his team's utter failure, he stated the team had holes, and they were not new holes but had existed for awhile. That statement alone his more than enough justification for his firing.
Pacificgem
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 12:03 PM
With all due respect Mr. Willes, what do you know about running a professional hockey club. Your inferring that you know more than Mr. Aquilini about running a business? You write news for a living, maybe you should stick you what you know!!! This is a positive move towards the future of the club, even when the Canucks won. It was painful at best to watch. Sincerely Paying Customer
from toronto,seen this movie
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 12:07 PM
welcome to toronto west.as long as the rink is full,the aquilinis could care less about winning.all professional sports are getting less and less interesting,time to take up kayaking and turn off the t.v.we're all being played for suckers,and its getting really boring.
RCC
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 12:11 PM
They should fire the coach too and get rid of that god awful boring style of play.
K.H.
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 12:13 PM
I disagree almost entirely with Ed Willes's thoughts on the firing of Dave Nonis. Owners have every right to demand an explanation for a spectacular downturn in a business's operation. Obviously Aquilinis did not like what he heard. Would you as owner carry on with someone that can't provide satisfactory answers or results? If the results are generally moving upwards, then some leniency may be offered for downward trends, especially if logical reasons and a good plan for a turnaround are given. I suspect Nonis wasn't up to the challenge for either. If things go badly south and contrary to what Willes would have you believe, it went way south this year, then change need to happen. The Canuck ship crumbled. In addition to the pathetic 'freefall', especially against Divisional opponents, nothing was most disgraceful than the 7-1 effort against Calgary. This said it all - last game for Linden, probably last for Nasland, full house and they lay a complete disaster in front of the home fans starting with the franchise "Lou' outwards. We are not privy to what Nonis said, but if it is anything like what he and AV said during the Canuck's downward slide or their last press conference, can we blame Aquilini? Neither Nonis nor AV knew what went wrong or had answers!!!!!! They had to go away and analyze the situation!!!!!! Sorry, wrong answers guys. If you are GM and coach, having to go away and analyze what went wrong shows you don't know what is going on. Absolutely no excuse. What were they doing during the Canuck's freefall? What was Nonis doing? If I was GM, I would be doing my damnest to get to the bottom of things, from the players, coaches, dressing room out because I know that a day of reckoning with the owner approaches! If Nonis had this master plan, any significant, especially negative developments have the potential to derail the entire plan. He should have had his finger on the pulse to assess whether his plan was still viable. Did it need any changes, how would it impact the future direction and especially would it affect the off season plans for new aquisitions? H also should of had recommendations. I have no idea, but being a business man, I suspect Aquilinis was not happy with the answers (and I suspect lack of) Nonis gave him to these types of questions. Sorry people, but the Canucks are a business and Aquilinis is the owner. As a responsible owner he needs to have people in charge that know what is going on and can react to unexpected situations. I do not think Aquilinis intends for the 'business' to fail. Consequently he is doing what any competent business owner would do; get rid of managers who have no idea how to manage. However, a competent owner would also have a plan for a competent replacement. On this I agree with Willes. Now we will see just how good of an owner Aquilinis is by his replacement. In the meantime, the next step should be be the firing of AV. Wrong guy, wrong place, wrong decade, wrong team. He did it in Montreal, did we really expect anything different here?
Paulo
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 12:24 PM
What are you talking about? Someone in this organisation must show that losing is not acceptable. Not only is losing not acceptable, the way the Canucks have missed the playoffs two out of the past three years was totally unacceptable. The handling of Trevor Linden's last season was pathetic. The free agent choices were pathetic. The style of hockey that Nonis wanted the Canucks to play was pathetic. The draft choices from the past three years are also questionable. As a season ticket holder I believe the firing of Nonis was completely justified. I'm glad to see that mediocrity has no place in the Canuck's organisation.
jjb2008
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 12:24 PM
I am glad he is gone because he is accountable for the product he had on the ice....recall it was Nonis who told us that we should believe that this team post-trading deadline deserves some credit...1-6 in there last 7 and being pushed around at the same time...no thanks, I would take any GM with a new philosophy than seeing the same product next year...I do agree Burke is not coming here but so what!
David W. Kuhn
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 12:30 PM
I totally agree. I would have liked to see Nonis make a deal before the trade dead-line as well, but not by sacrificing the teams slowly establishing depth chart. The team had significant injuries to their defensive core, which if healthy or fewer lost games among them, would have ensured making the playoffs. The bigger problem in my view is the lack of scoring, and the frequently indifferent play from their captain. This may be unfair, but I failed to see many signs of leadership "on the ice!" I believe Alain Vigneault is more at fault than Nonis. His player selection for games vs. the players he sat in the press box left me mystified frequently. I even stopped watching Canuck pay-per-view half-way through the season because the hockey was not entertaining. Too bad, as I considered myself a loyal fan.
Jerry
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 12:32 PM
Dave Nonis and Alain, seen to get a pass from the media because they are media friendly. The exact oppisite was the case with Burke and Crowe, they were under the microscope because they were not media friendly. I would take Burke, Crowe combo and that style of hockey any day over this group. If we didn't win, at least we were entertained.
B
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 12:33 PM
Two theories: Entertainment Theory: Nonis/Vigneaults style bored them to death, that boring defensive style is fine IF YOU ARE WINNING. If you're a boring team who loses what good are you? As good Return on investment theory: The Canucks spent near the cap so in the $50 million range and those $50 million in assets are golfing. Pathetic Nashvile spent near the cap floor so in the $30 million range and are in the playoffs. Which team allocated their money better? who's in charge of making those decisions? Mr Nonis for Vancouver. As good a defensive team as they are the Canucks shortcomings were no mystery, Nonis had over 18 months to address the lack of scoring and he did nothing, he had more than enough time. HIs "plan" was flawed anyways. Why does the best goalie in the world need a defensive squad to protect him? wouldn't it make more sense to score goals and give him a lead to work with, trusting he is more than capable of keeping the puck out of the net on his own?
Canucklelion
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 12:41 PM
It all comes down to Nonis' perceived plan. At the start of the season, we were led to believe he had saved some cap room to make a play to add offense later in the season. Granted our needs changed during the season. By the trade deadline it became apparent that in addition to offence the Nuck's needed a better back up to be able to afford Roberto some time off to attend his family matters as well as another defender or two was needed to bolster the beat up defense. Zippo, nada + squat were added and the Nuck's instead of rising to the challenge ran up the white flag + the players appeared to pull the plug on their playoff chances. Timing is everything in sports + Nonis' timing was terrible. I doubt that his next step would have met fans expectations either. Leadership is key + the owner + GM's desire to win just didn't seem to filter down to the players. Was it getting side tracked at the coaching level? It seems no one was drinking the kool aid. Hopefully Francesco Aquilini's plan will come to fruition quickly + the Nuck's new leadership will be in place soon.
Mark
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 12:54 PM
I totally agree. It frustrating how many fans don't realize how close Nonis was to implementing his plan and giving this city a cup contending team next year. Given that pretty much all professional sports commentators are saying the same thing its a wonder how many Maple Leaf style fans are cheering on this disaster.
Mac
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 12:56 PM
Wiles Its time you got another job! Say what you want about the ownewrship but they are winners. Thats all the fans want.
Mike
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 01:01 PM
I guess if Ed was the owner he would be content with 2 of 3 years missing the playoffs and stick with the same guy who was brought us that wonderful achievment. In my mind Nonis would not have been fired if he made a reasonable effort to improve this team when it was obvious they needed help. Even if the trades failed at least he would have tried. Maybe bad reporting is acceptable in Vancouver but I am pretty sure that losing no longer is. This was the right move. This team can no longer say to its fans "we are happy just too make the playoffs". We are sick of that attitude.
Nick
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 01:01 PM
I had a very odd dream last night. I dreamt that the Canucks were playing in game 7 of the cup final, against Colorado (which makes no sense) and the won the game 7-3, but they didn't win the cup because the refs thought they didn't deserve it. I blame Nonis for this.
islanddarky
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 01:38 PM
I think Willes is completely out to lunch. For years, we were fed a steady diet by these same media types that we as fans deserved better than an "absentee owner" who didn't care about hockey and let Stan "the Gasman" McCammon run the franchise into the ground. Now, with an owner raised a Canuck fan and resident in the city, Willes is complaining about the decisive action that FA took. Yes, he bilked Keenan in the Luongo deal, and yes he inherited Burke's team in the first year, but he also re-signed Burke's boys to long term deals that crippled the Canucks under the cap for the past two years. Further, he picked up failed spare parts like Chouinard, Bulis, Isbister, Ritchie, Smolinski, etc. instead of addressing the dire need for scoring. He employed this "rescue former 1st rounders from the scrap heap" philosophy with guys like Pyatt, Krajicek and Isbister (albeit Pyatt having worked out) instead of drafting his own blue chip prospects. He wasted our first round picks on "off the chart" gambles, and on and on and on. Yes, Nonis is a nice guy, but with this decision, FA did what Nonis could not do as a GM here - take the bull by the horns and make the type of firm decision that a leader is supposed to make.
JFJ
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 01:49 PM
I'll take the job!!! JFJ
keith mckinnon
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 02:06 PM
My question about the whole thing is this; if a team can be under the salary cap, sell out every game ( a lot of those tickets are bought and resold at an even higher price- that shows a very dedicated fan base) and sell tons of merchandise based on a bunch of different sweaters, do the owners really care if the team goes all the way in the playoffs? Especially if that cup drive means taking a financial risk?
Canucklelion
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 02:20 PM
It all comes down to Nonis' perceived plan. At the start of the season, we were led to believe he had saved some cap room to make a play to add offense later in the season. Granted our needs changed during the season. By the trade deadline it became apparent that in addition to offence the Nuck's needed a better back up to be able to afford Roberto some time off to attend his family matters as well as another defender or two was needed to bolster the beat up defense. Zippo, nada + squat were added and the Nuck's instead of rising to the challenge ran up the white flag + the players appeared to pull the plug on their playoff chances. Timing is everything in sports + Nonis' timing was terrible. I doubt that his next step would have met fans expectations either. Leadership is key + the owner + GM's desire to win just didn't seem to filter down to the players. Was it getting side tracked at the coaching level? It seems no one was drinking the kool aid. Hopefully Francesco Aquilini's plan will come to fruition quickly + the Nuck's new leadership will be in place soon.
bcbuddy
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 02:55 PM
The firing was in response to the answers Nonis gave in his meetibg with owners regarding his plan and the seasons poor ending , i was a little surprised but actually agree that the managemant did little to effect changes when it was easy to see the club needed some help and this situation has been apparent for 2 seasons and that was obvious to fans and reporters who wrote tirelessly about the boring system and need for scoring . I as a fan had hoped the local boy would have done well but he didnt get where his industry demands and taht is a fact in every business if you cant succeed they find someone else who will and honestly i think it will prove to be a good decision as changes were certainly needed and ownership will tolerate no half hearted explanations of we are close if Nonis had good answers and responses in his year end meetings witha confident plan understood by owners i am sure he would still be here so lets move on and see whats next.
airchinapilot
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 03:40 PM
This is an entertainment business and this team was not entertaining. Every win was an excruciating grind out.. every loss was even more painful. Getting Luongo was great, but Luongo can't score goals. I felt sorry for him many times this season. Remember how they lost the last game in round two? I felt terrible for Luongo. This was essentially the same team. All they added were fringe players like Isbister who made no impact.
MY THOUGHT
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 04:14 PM
The price of of failure, in this case missing the playoffs , cost Dave Nonis his job. For those who think it an unfair price because of a no brainer deal for Roberto Luongo, wake up. Anyone would have done that in their sleep. The cold hard fact is despite more than adequate goal tending, we could not score consistently and needed to find scoring talent . Nonis made no significant moves since the signing of Luongo. End of story . I'm certain DN will find a new job , and the Vancouver Canucks will move forward . Whoever is hired as new GM find us some guys that put the puck in the net , and get us back to the playoffs . Please , I'm begging you !
Burnaby Bob
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 04:33 PM
Agree with you all the way. The press conference today filled in any spaces that you didn't talk about Ed. It was brutal. Every word about "Leadership" "owe it to the fans" etc. etc. was enough to make me sick. I really believe there are dark days ahead for the Canucks and there will only be light when the team is sold - again. Maybe Beedie and Gagliardi are the winners in this after all.
The WhiteSheet
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 04:59 PM
I wouldn't say that the sky has fallen just yet. A new GM will bring new life (good or bad), and a new attitude. Everything else at this point is fluff, and assumption. If your going to try a new direction and attitude, there was no better time than now. Hold on its gonna be a wild summer.
Hunh?
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 05:02 PM
What are you smoking, Willes? Talk about being out of touch with reality!
Ken W
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 05:59 PM
Ed Wiles article is so off base it isn't even funny. Here is the GM of a team that just went from first in their division to 11th in the conference standing before the media and stating things are better now then last year...really? He never went and got the scroing that was evident to everyone, at the trade deadline. He pulls off the Luongo trade and that is it. But one trade does not fix the problems the problems that have been hanging on this team for quite a while. Well Ed Willes a lot of good men lose their jobs. Just because a good guy, your words, he may be does not mean he is not responsible for his own in-actions. Fans deserve better...not status quo. He would have just continued the status quo. By the way to all of those who want Nalsund resigned, please how stupid the guy is finished period.
gr
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 06:37 PM
i guess we'll find out next season who's right and who's a bone head
terry k
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 06:38 PM
a memo to aqulini...whomever you decide hire for gm,you better leave him with full power,it sounds to me like this is turning into a maple leaf type of fiasco....ownership should butt out and leave the hockey decsisions to the HOCKEY people...aqulini is about as qualified to make hockey decsisions as bozo the clown.
NUCKER
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 06:52 PM
Good firing! Can we also have the scouting staff fired to and take Willes with them!
islandfan
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 08:08 PM
One has to wonder what were the responses gave by Nonis that were unacceptable and ended in his termination. There obviously is a flaw in the canucks system. This is just one step in correcting that and getting the team winning again and making runs at conference titles. There were trades missed in the off season and trade deadline and before. Free agents and offer-sheets were not given to any availeble player... why? Nonis was the one who gave Nasland and Morrison the large contracts which handcuffed the team the past two years. Now it is very important to see who the owners bring in for GM to get this team playing exciting hockey again.
L-Mo
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 08:20 PM
Hmmm, Nonis fired the day after Bobby (the offersheet) Clark announces he's ready to come back to the game. Strange bedfellows indeed.
Heavy G
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 08:21 PM
Getting rid of Nonis is only the first half of this move. The second half is who they replace him with. The proof of whether the Aquilinis did the right thing will be if they can move up to the BBD (bigger better deal). Whenever I hear people ranting at the team to make a change, I ask myself, is the alternative better than what you have now? Stay tuned for the answer.....
Gerjeff
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 08:53 PM
Can't wait for this gong show to start.Ferguson jr.available,Pat Quinn just waiting for the call.Another decade of circus-circus.
dan
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 10:06 PM
This move wasn't a surprise. This team was the beneficiary of many one goal or overtime games last year. They couldn't score enough last year, and this year that was their downfall. How many wins are you going to get when you always have to rely on your goaltender to bail you out? They couldn't do it this season because one goal wins don't go on forever. Time to shake this team up. Bring in some new blood!
darkken
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 10:18 PM
Which GM candidate would want to come to this gong show? 2 months before the draft and this organization decides to do a massive overhaul. Granted, Nonis could not get a scorer but why did they need a scorer when the coach would turn him into a 4th line grinder. Nonis tried to give his coach what he needed to be comfortable with, hence all the signings of defencemen and grinders. And for all those people burying Naslund, he changed his game entirely to work with this coach. If he goes to a team that actually allows their players to be creative, he may have a couple of seasons in him
Pete
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 10:57 PM
Jeez, Canuck fans are more myopic than Leaf fans. Firng Nonis at this point is just a complete lack of class. Who would want to work for sharks like these. However, whoever might inherit this club will be thaking Nonis for not selling the farm. Theres a lot of owrk to do to re-assemble the roster and all the chips are there. But Aquillini's will very likely rob the cookie jar. I note JF Junior has his application in above. Better accept because Bowman and Burke won't be applying.
Pete
Tue, Apr 15, 08 at 10:59 PM
Oh and its refreshing to read a strong opinion for a change instead of the mealy mouth shite that passes for sports reporting these days. Thanks Ed.
losers
Wed, Apr 16, 08 at 12:49 AM
...and here begins the descent into another decade of mediocrity, just as we were seeing daylight. Nonis played it right and planned correctly. These clowns haven't a clue and reacted out of fear and an ego-driven need to 'make a statement.' like dogs pissing on a telephone pole. I do not look forward to watching what I think will be a gong show for the time these 'condo-builders' own this club.
Island Dave
Wed, Apr 16, 08 at 01:27 AM
Had to be done, the buck stops with the GM. Now keep swinging that axe, Alain Vigneault, Naslund, the Sedin sisters....let's start from the ground up with some guys who want to win, not just pick up paychecks for mediocre play!
New Western
Wed, Apr 16, 08 at 01:34 AM
Ah yes. Nonis did nothing ... other than make a great trade for Luongo. He no longer gets credit for that, as one of the commenters said it was a given - it wasn't a given that he would come here. Nonis had a legacy of the Burke days hanging around his neck, and this was the year he could clear it all away - Nasland, Morrison etc... he should have been given another year to make it work. Mr. Willes is absolutely correct in his assessment.
John
Wed, Apr 16, 08 at 02:32 AM
Wiles actually gets paid to write for this paper? This article is one of the worst, most over-dramatic pieces of utter tripe I've ever had the misfortune of reading. I mean look at this: "We may never know but, today, we know a good man lost his job, and the pity here is Nonis couldn't fire the owner." Are you kidding me? Fire the owner? Good Lord, what idiocy!! You'd think Nonis had put together a 3x Cup Champ. Instead, he presided over failure. Something he was used to in the decade he was here. Kudos to Mr. Aquilini for firing Nonis as it was obvious that as a GM he was way in over his head. I wouldn't let Nonis put Lego together never mind a hockey team. It's not hard to see why Wiles is a lowly sports writer while Aquilini is a successful billionaire. Stick to your day job Ed and leave the heavy thinking to those who can do it.
CALIFORNIA DAN
Wed, Apr 16, 08 at 02:33 AM
This is the most idiotic sports column I have read in years. The Canucks, as a team and product, have deteriorated and it has been plainly obvious for quite a while that Dave Nonis is, and would continue to be, incapable of stemming the tide. A new GM will get the benefit of a clean slate and a lot of room on the salary cap - the timing was absolutely right to make a move. There will be no shortage of interested candidates for the job - watch what transpires over the next week or two.
Kevin
Wed, Apr 16, 08 at 01:33 PM
Ed, where the hell were you earlier this month when the media and the wise asses on radio were crucifying Nonis and blaming him for every catastrophy. Typical of the media to find a way to criticize everything that anybody does. In the last week, everyone was bemoaning the failure of the Canucks. I am not convinced that the owners made the right decision, only time will tell. This much I do know. 1. Nonis was too conservative in his approach, both he and especially Vigneault played everything not to lose, rather than to win. For example, Lowe may be an idiot in Edmonton, but at least he takes some chances to try and improve his team. 2. Vigneault is the wrong kind of coach for the NHL. He is too risk averse. He is too desirous of being seen in a good light by the media. 3. Vigneault and Nonis for supporting him, made several major mistakes. A) They did not rest Luongo when it was clear that mentally he was struggling (understandably given the issues around the birth of his child). B) Completely mishandled Trevor Linden and wasted a great leadership asset. I don't care if some guys might have been more physically able - Isbister, Cowan, Rypien, Brown (though I think that is doubtful) they needed Linden's leadership and pride on the ice. C) They destroyed Markus Naslunds sense of fun and self confidence and the team payed the price. The ridiculous argument of needing a right hand shot on the power play as a reason not to use him with the Sedin's is ridiculous. The percentage change over time is about 1% more effective. Ruin a guy for one percent. D) His constant line matching phobia proved useless. 4. Vigneaults vaunted skils were based on winning the Adams, which I contend he got as a sop to Vancouver because they wanted The Kid to get MVP instead of Luongo. The Adams should have gone to Luongo, he earned it.
C Marc
Thu, Apr 17, 08 at 02:09 AM
Great article Ed, ignore all the short-sighted fans. This is the problem with a city that is too emotionally invested in one team. Emotions blind rationality and sometimes that prevents seeing the bigger picture. Now that's OK if your a fan. But when your owner acts that way as well, you've got trouble. And the Canucks could be in big trouble.
tivdkr pozmvqkn
Sun, Dec 21, 08 at 09:55 AM
orgle ochkil kvpsiw odjeg azsfxedk jnlwicmza melunth
Add Your Comment
 
Your Name
 
Your Comment
 
 
The Rules:
 
Keep it clean, and stay on the subject or we might delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. You must have a javascript enabled browser to submit a comment.
 
 
 

Who is Canada's biggest threat?

Dave Waddell and Elliott Pap go head2head.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

past head2head

 

Debating the deals

Wayne Scanlan and George Johnson go head2head.

 

Canadiens goalie situation...

Dave Stubbs and Pat Hickey go head2head.

 

Two views on head injuries...

Cam Cole and John MacKinnon go head2head.