Photos: Take a look at the three arena options
 

Photos: Take a look at the three arena options

 

City administrators presented three downtown arena options to Edmonton city council on Jan. 23, 2012. Option A features a Wintergarden with an enclosed pedway and an underground parkade. Option B has an open-air walkway and above-ground parking. Option C eliminates the Wintergarden and has no pedestrian ramp over 104th Avenue. Scroll through the photos for each option.

 
 
 
 
Option A: This is the value engineered original design including a Wintergarden and underground parkade. This option offers 18,559 (manifested seats) and is similar in design and program to the original design including: Wintergarden; 350-stall underground parkade; stainless steel cladding executed more cost effectively; $480M arena; $601M total project (includes arena and public infrastructure); $219M City contribution; $143M Katz Group contribution; provides guaranteed tenant.
 

Option A: This is the value engineered original design including a Wintergarden and underground parkade. This option offers 18,559 (manifested seats) and is similar in design and program to the original design including: Wintergarden; 350-stall underground parkade; stainless steel cladding executed more cost effectively; $480M arena; $601M total project (includes arena and public infrastructure); $219M City contribution; $143M Katz Group contribution; provides guaranteed tenant.

Photograph by: Supplied, City of Edmonton

 
Option A: This is the value engineered original design including a Wintergarden and underground parkade. This option offers 18,559 (manifested seats) and is similar in design and program to the original design including: Wintergarden; 350-stall underground parkade; stainless steel cladding executed more cost effectively; $480M arena; $601M total project (includes arena and public infrastructure); $219M City contribution; $143M Katz Group contribution; provides guaranteed tenant.
Option A: This is the value engineered original design including a Wintergarden and underground parkade. This option offers 18,559 (manifested seats) and is similar in design and program to the original design including: Wintergarden; 350-stall underground parkade; stainless steel cladding executed more cost effectively; $480M arena; $601M total project (includes arena and public infrastructure); $219M City contribution; $143M Katz Group contribution; provides guaranteed tenant.
Option A: This is the value engineered original design including a Wintergarden and underground parkade. This option offers 18,559 (manifested seats) and is similar in design and program to the original design including: Wintergarden; 350-stall underground parkade; stainless steel cladding executed more cost effectively; $480M arena; $601M total project (includes arena and public infrastructure); $219M City contribution; $143M Katz Group contribution; provides guaranteed tenant.
Option A: This is the value engineered original design including a Wintergarden and underground parkade. This option offers 18,559 (manifested seats) and is similar in design and program to the original design including: Wintergarden; 350-stall underground parkade; stainless steel cladding executed more cost effectively; $480M arena; $601M total project (includes arena and public infrastructure); $219M City contribution; $143M Katz Group contribution; provides guaranteed tenant.
Option B: This is a revised design to include open air pedestrian linkage over 104th Avenue and an above-grade parkade. It includes 18,559 seats and is similar in design and program to the original design. The differences are: Wintergarden replaced with pedestrian link over 104th Ave.; 340-stall above-grade parkade; seating bowl revised, removal of some premium spaces; additional opportunities for integration of 104th Ave. introduced; new at grade entry plaza added; $493M arena; $576.8M total project (includes arena and public infrastructure); $214.9M City contribution; tenant to be determined.
Option B: This is a revised design to include open air pedestrian linkage over 104th Avenue and an above-grade parkade. It includes 18,559 seats and is similar in design and program to the original design. The differences are: Wintergarden replaced with pedestrian link over 104th Ave.; 340-stall above-grade parkade; seating bowl revised, removal of some premium spaces; additional opportunities for integration of 104th Ave. introduced; new at grade entry plaza added; $493M arena; $576.8M total project (includes arena and public infrastructure); $214.9M City contribution; tenant to be determined.
Option B: This is a revised design to include open air pedestrian linkage over 104th Avenue and an above-grade parkade. It includes 18,559 seats and is similar in design and program to the original design. The differences are: Wintergarden replaced with pedestrian link over 104th Ave.; 340-stall above-grade parkade; seating bowl revised, removal of some premium spaces; additional opportunities for integration of 104th Ave. introduced; new at grade entry plaza added; $493M arena; $576.8M total project (includes arena and public infrastructure); $214.9M City contribution; tenant to be determined.
Option B: This is a revised design to include open air pedestrian linkage over 104th Avenue and an above-grade parkade. It includes 18,559 seats and is similar in design and program to the original design. The differences are: Wintergarden replaced with pedestrian link over 104th Ave.; 340-stall above-grade parkade; seating bowl revised, removal of some premium spaces; additional opportunities for integration of 104th Ave. introduced; new at grade entry plaza added; $493M arena; $576.8M total project (includes arena and public infrastructure); $214.9M City contribution; tenant to be determined.
Option C: This is a revised design to remove the Wintergarden and include an above-grade parkade. It includes 18,559 seats and is similar in design and program to the original design. The differences are: Wintergarden deleted; 300-stall above-grade parkade and 44 stalls below grade for team use; seating bowl revised, removal of some premium spaces; additional opportunities for integration of 104th Ave. introduced; new at grade entry plaza added; $511.75M arena; $571.25M total project (includes arena and public infrastructure); $217.25M City contribution; tenant to be determined.
Option C: This is a revised design to remove the Wintergarden and include an above-grade parkade. It includes 18,559 seats and is similar in design and program to the original design. The differences are: Wintergarden deleted; 300-stall above-grade parkade and 44 stalls below grade for team use; seating bowl revised, removal of some premium spaces; additional opportunities for integration of 104th Ave. introduced; new at grade entry plaza added; $511.75M arena; $571.25M total project (includes arena and public infrastructure); $217.25M City contribution; tenant to be determined.
Option C: This is a revised design to remove the Wintergarden and include an above-grade parkade. It includes 18,559 seats and is similar in design and program to the original design. The differences are: Wintergarden deleted; 300-stall above-grade parkade and 44 stalls below grade for team use; seating bowl revised, removal of some premium spaces; additional opportunities for integration of 104th Ave. introduced; new at grade entry plaza added; $511.75M arena; $571.25M total project (includes arena and public infrastructure); $217.25M City contribution; tenant to be determined.
Option C: This is a revised design to remove the Wintergarden and include an above-grade parkade. It includes 18,559 seats and is similar in design and program to the original design. The differences are: Wintergarden deleted; 300-stall above-grade parkade and 44 stalls below grade for team use; seating bowl revised, removal of some premium spaces; additional opportunities for integration of 104th Ave. introduced; new at grade entry plaza added; $511.75M arena; $571.25M total project (includes arena and public infrastructure); $217.25M City contribution; tenant to be determined.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Scoreboard

5/22/2013 3:43:31 AM
 
Final123otscore
 
Boston
002-2
NY Rangers
010-1
 
Final123otscore
 
San Jose
110-2
Los Angeles
001-1
 
 
 

 
Your voice
How should the Toronto Maple Leafs feel about the season?
 
Devastated after Game 7
It's a good building block for youngsters
Don't know.
Too soon, I am still hurting