Yzerman heads to the Hall

He was one of the greatest players to ever pull on a hockey uniform. These days the pride of Nepean is preparing to make his mark as the suit

Wayne Scanlan, Ottawa Citizen

Published: Sunday, November 08, 2009

Testing NHL players was an inexact science back in the early 1980s, a time when prospects and veterans still "played themselves into shape" during training camp. In 1983-84, the new head coach of the Detroit Red Wings was Nick Polano, today a pro scout for the Ottawa Senators. It was the summer before his first season and Polano was checking in with his trainer, Jim Pengelly, for the results of the precamp physical tests. Pengelly was big on strength training, but had more of a background in soccer than hockey.

Only five players in NHL history have accumulated more points that Steve Yzerman's 1,755.

Only five players in NHL history have accumulated more points that Steve Yzerman's 1,755.

Photograph by : Getty Images

ARTICLE TOOLS

Font:
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

As Polano told the story years later for Bob Duff's book 19: A Salute to Steve Yzerman, Pengelly walked into Polano's office and raved about the team's big, strong guys - grinders like Joey Kocur and Stu Grimson. And then he added:

"You've got one really skinny guy down there, you'll have to send him home.

"He can't weight." "What's his name?" Polano asked. "Steve Why-zerman," Pengelly said, to which Polano responded:

"No, that's Yzerman and if he can't play, I'm in big trouble as the coach."

The skinny kid could play, all right. Right from the drop of the puck in 1983, when the 160-pounder, wet towel included, opened his rookie NHL season with a goal and an assist against the old Winnipeg Jets.

Yzerman, adopted as Nepean's own son after moving here from British Columbia in his boyhood, played himself into the Hockey Hall of Fame as one of the game's all-time greats. A humble superstar.

On Monday, Yzerman, 44, will be inducted into the Hall along with fellow players Brian Leetch, Brett Hull, Luc Robitaille and builder Lou Lamoriello. None of the group is more Hall-worthy than Yzerman, sixth all-time among NHL scoring leaders with 1,755 points in 22 seasons with the Detroit Red Wings, including five seasons with 50 or more goals.

During his unprecedented 20-year reign as captain, Stevie Y led the Wings to three Stanley Cup championships. He won a fourth in a management role with the Wings

For that final taste of glory as a player in 2002, Yzerman carried his team on one good leg, just a few months after playing through excruciating pain to help Canada to its first Olympic gold medal in men's hockey in 50 years - both feats a testament to his will, courage and pain tolerance.

These war stories will be told and retold in Toronto over the next few days, which for Yzerman might represent a short respite from his work as executive director of Canada's 2010 Olympic men's hockey team.

In his other day job, Yzerman is vice-president of the Red Wings and a key member of Detroit's stellar management triumvirate, alongside GM Ken Holland and assistant GM Jim Nill.

From the moment he retired as a player in 2006, Yzerman gave no indication he'd be content resting his weary limbs and playing leisurely rounds of golf. His passion for hockey kept him in hockey, a GM-intraining, inside perhaps the best-run organization in the game.

Even as we pause to salute Steve Yzerman's brilliant playing career, Yzerman is off and running as a suit: the player capable of performing on one leg is onto the next leg of his hockey odyssey. Stevie Y, NHL general manager? And why not?

"He's going to be a great NHL general manager if and when he wants to be," Hockey Canada president Bob Nicholson said in an interview last week.

Unlike some elite hockey players, Brett Hull being the obvious example from the disastrous Dallas Stars experiment, Yzerman didn't expect to be handed a top management position until he learned from the ground up.

As a player, Yzerman was the superstar who toiled like the third-liners, a philosophy he's carried into his off-ice career.

"He's not afraid to work," says Doug Armstrong, director of player personnel for Canada's 2010 hockey management team. Armstrong was the Dallas Stars' GM from 2002-08 and is now VP of player personnel for the St. Louis Blues.

"Steve's been to Grand Rapids (Detroit's AHL farm team)," Armstrong says. "See him at world championships and now the Olympics, he's out watching games, he does a lot of video scouting. So, he's rolling up his sleeves. He doesn't give the impression that it's a God-given right to manage.

"He's doing the proper work to get into the position that, if he decides he wants to manage, he'll be prepared."

Potential draft picks, trade options and free-agent signings, Yzerman has been involved with the Red Wings inner business for more than three years.

Armstrong first worked with Yzerman as an adviser at the 2007 world championship, where Yzerman was Team Canada's GM. Their roles carried over to the '08 championship in Halifax and Quebec. This past spring Armstrong was GM of Canada's worlds team in Switzerland while Yzerman focused on his Olympian task of formulating a roster for Vancouver in February. He kept in constant contact with Armstrong and flew to Switzerland to see Canada's important tournament games.

Those who work closely with Yzerman describe his management style as patient, inclusive, but firm. He doesn't get paralysed from information overload. And Yzerman knows in his mind what kind of team he wants to build - for Canada in February, and, soon enough, within the NHL salary cap system.

"He's very thorough, he likes everybody's opinion, but it's not a consensus where everyone gets a vote. And I appreciate that," Armstrong says.

"At the end of the day, he understands that he's the manager and he has to make the difficult calls. He does try to solicit as much information as he can, and asks astute questions on the players, but at the end of the day, his name is at the top of the list. He has to make those calls and he's certainly not afraid to do that."

Holland, Yzerman's "boss" in Detroit, is an associate personnel director, along with Edmonton's Kevin Lowe, for the Canadian effort in Vancouver.

"It's role reversal," Holland says. "I'm the manager of the Red Wings. Steve will voice his opinion and Jimmy Nill and (head coach) Mike Babcock, but ultimately there has to be one decision-maker.

"In Detroit, that's me. With Hockey Canada, it's Steve."

Holland, who has had the best run in hockey as Detroit's GM since July 1997 (three Cups, four Presidents' Trophies, nine Central Division titles), believes the Red Wings model hasn't missed a beat because everyone involved has been willing to check his ego at the door.

"That's one of the things Steve did so well when he was a part of the on-ice team," Holland says.

Holland terms the hockey operations group - Holland, Nill, Yzerman and capologist Ryan Martin - a "think tank." It's an embarrassment of riches, just as the Wings have often been on the ice. According to Holland, he has two staffers qualified to be GMs - Nill and Yzerman.

"Ultimately, there comes a time in everyone's career when a decision has to be made because people are looking for bigger challenges and bigger responsibilities and a bigger title," Holland says. "But for now everyone's bought into the team and

Holland and Nill both have one more year on their Red Wings contracts after this season. Yzerman's deal is a little open-ended. When the Olympics and Stanley Cup playoffs are over, the timing could be perfect for Yzerman to take on a new challenge.

"In the right situation, it's something I would consider," Yzerman said on a media conference call this week. "I've been with the organization here in Detroit my entire career, as you know. I really enjoyed being a part of the management, working with our management group, being in the organization. It's important to me.

"But that's a goal I've always had (being a GM). It's something that I would have to consider. For me, when I'm asked that, the decision ultimately will be - am I content in the role I'm at here or do I want a challenge of going somewhere?

"That's a decision I'll have to make at some point," Yzerman said. "I'll get through this year with the Olympics and we'll worry about it later on. Right now, it's not really on my mind."

Hockey Canada isn't in any hurry for Yzerman to get his first NHL GM job. It works out well, Yzerman having a loosely defined role in Detroit, enabling him to focus on the Olympic project this season.

"Anybody that gets Steve Yzerman, that organization would benefit," Nicholson says. "But as he's done everything in his career, he's going to do it on his time, and the situation he thinks is right for him and his family."

 
 
 
 
 

your comments
Dan
Sun, Nov 8, 09 at 10:45 PM
Yzerman was an excellent player, but there is no way he should be in before Doug Gilmour. Just compare individual talent, and then consider Yzerman got a little luckey to be on great teams. Gilmour is getting shafted.
Brian P
Mon, Nov 9, 09 at 09:36 AM
Gilmour was a punk and a criminal compared to Steve Yzerman. If they hadn't banned the practise of the best players being inducted immediately upon retirement after Gretzky hung his skates up, Yzerman would be deserving of that honour. He's one of the all-time greats.
hockey fan- 11
Mon, Nov 9, 09 at 12:29 PM
hey dan: you have no clue do you. when yzerman was drafted, the wings were the worst team in hockey. Yzerman made that team great!! gilmour was and still is a PUTZ..
One of the Best Ever
Mon, Nov 9, 09 at 02:30 PM
I am certainly not a Red Wings fan, but Steve Yzerman is one of the best and classiest players to ever play in the NHL. Overshadowed most of his career, by Gretzky, Lemieux,and Messier he quietly went about his business as one of the great leaders in pro sport as well. Never complained, or voiced displeasure with his team, Steve Yzerman is a consumate pro who once scored 160 points in a season.Always a leader, he changed his game in the mid 90's to develop more of an all round game and led his team to the Stanley Cup. I always said if you had a team full of Yzerman's you would never lose. Congratulations Steve, and good luck in Vancouver.
Gilmour vs Yzerman???
Mon, Nov 9, 09 at 02:39 PM
Not even close, what's next Dan is Thomas Kaberle better than Bobby Orr? Felix Potvin better than Grant Fuhr. Come on man, give the Leafs propaganda a rest. You must not have ever seen the great Steve Yzerman play have you. To be quite honest I am not sure Doug Gilmour has done enough to get into the Hall of Fame, certainly not on the first ballot. Lets face it, Gilmour was an average player in St. Louis and Calgary, but did have a couple of pretty good years in Toronto. Steve Yzerman had a great career from start to finish capped off by 3 Stanley Cups and the respect of every single player in the NHL. If Gilmour plays his entire career in St. Louis we aren't even having this conversation. Even Leaf fans that watch hockey would admit this. Insulting to anyone who has watched hockey over the last 20 years.
Dan
Mon, Nov 9, 09 at 06:47 PM
I have accepted that there are many Toronto haters out there. If Gilmour's body of work involved mostly time in Montreal or New York, he would be in with the exact same stats. Yzerman deserves to be in the Hall, but Gilmour deserves it to (IMO moreso). Also, look at what Sundin did over his career. They wave the 3 year waiting period for a guy like Mario Lemieux but not Sundin??? And since someone mentioned Kaberle - he is a better player than Dick Duff. Duff is in the Hall, Kaberle will probably never get the chance because of the anti-Toronto politics out there. Those are the facts people.
Dan
Mon, Nov 9, 09 at 06:54 PM
Also, if you doubt politics don't enter into The Hall of Fame selections, look at the career of Herb Brooks. There is no way he deserves to be there based on one good handfull of games where his team over-achieved. It's politics folks.
Bryan
Mon, Nov 9, 09 at 08:26 PM
I totally agree. If Paul Henderson had not been a Leaf he would have been in the Hall for sure. If Yzerman had been a Leaf he would not get in as easily although he was such a great player he would have gotten in eventually.
Brian P
Tue, Nov 10, 09 at 07:13 AM
Dan, how can you claim there's an anti-Toronto bias, then specifically bring up Dick Duff, who played most of his career in Toronto? That doesn't make any sense. Even mentioning Mats Sundin in the same sentence as Mario Lemieux is so foolish I won't even dignify that one, except to say this: Lemieux had almost 400 more career points than Sundin and played more than 400 fewer games. Nothing more to be said. And you show your complete ignorance of any hockey played outside Toronto with your comment on Herb Brooks, who is one of the most important figures in US Hockey history.
Agreed Brian
Tue, Nov 10, 09 at 01:55 PM
One day there is a bias toward Toronto the next day there isn't. Sorry but Mats Sundin and Doug Gilmour are not even close to the players that Steve Yzerman and Mario Lemieux were. There is no Toronto bias, just these guys are not as good as the two Hall of Famers. Good players, even very good players but not Great Players.
Dan
Tue, Nov 10, 09 at 07:13 PM
I mention Dick Duff only in reference to a sarcastic comment about Kaberle not being good enough when my opinion is Kaberle is more talented as Duff if he sticks around. The fact Duff is from Toronto is strictly a bonus, but that wasn't the point. I know Mario is loved by all, and I like him too, but if you look at the whole package of Mario from day 1, not wanting to go to Pittsburgh and acting like a baby about it, never played great defence, partied hard a few time (that is all I will say about that), and lack of longevity. Yes he was an amazing offensive talent and yes he deserves to be in the Hall, without question. Compare him now to Sundin. Sundin had a better and more mature attitude as a youth, had greater longevity, was not as prolific offensively but had great numbers nonetheless and was better defensively. In my opinion they both deserve to be in the Hall. If you want to give an edge to Mario it would be in that he won a cup. As for Herb Brooks, he my be important to American hockey, but does he mean more to them than Paul Henderson means to Canadians. Brooks was an average coach who had some success for about two years. Good for Brooks, he was a nice guy and is in the Hall. My point is simply that Toronto and our players gets judged in a harsher light.
Jay T
Tue, Nov 10, 09 at 08:12 PM
Toronto gets the shaft by the New York establiblishment once again. Gilmour deserves to be there as much as Lou Lamarillo.
Todd
Tue, Nov 10, 09 at 10:18 PM
Why did Lamarello get in? He strikes me as the type that did as much harm as good. His teams were successfull, but boring. And he always seemed to fight with players, there was tampering, getting around the cap by sending players to the minors? Strange.
seriously Dan
Wed, Nov 11, 09 at 01:38 AM
Seriously Dan do you know anything about hockey??? Your comments lack knowledge of the game and its players. Althought I'm not a huge fans of US hockey, you have to give Herb Brooks his due. The Miracle on Ice from the 1980 Olympics was one of the greatest upsets in international hockey. Lucky as it may have been, those American kids beat the Great Red Army team. With respect to your Leafs getting shafted, do you seriously think Doug Gilmore deserves a spot in the Hall before the 6th place all time point getter? Having grown up in Windsor I got to see first hand how great Yzerman is and that franchise was rebuilt around him. They sure weren't great when he got there and he had more than a few lean years. He was the team for many of those early years. He changed his game to make the team better and they learned to win. His early high scoring years he was in the shadow of Gretzky and Lemieux. Seriously are you for real? Gilmore was good, Yzerman was great!
Dan
Wed, Nov 11, 09 at 02:23 AM
Doug Gilmour and Paul Henderson belong in the HHOF.....period.
Brian P
Wed, Nov 11, 09 at 06:54 AM
Brooks is not in the Hall simply because of that win. He's there because, as I said, he's one of the largest figures in American hockey history, and was for his entire career. I'm not going to argue too hard against Henderson, but he doesn't prove anything towards your supposed "Toronto bias"; if he was ever inducted it would be based little on what he did in the NHL and more on what he did for Team Canada in the Summit Series. If Duff doesn't disporve your "Toronto bias," Henderson in no way confirms it. Doug Gilmour was a very good player, not a great one. it's as simple as that. Doug Gilmour will never appear on lists of the 100 best of all time, or the 20 best centres of all time, or the 50 best Canadian players of all time. And Mats Sundin was not even as good a player as Gilmour was. To suggest that either one should be in the Hall ahead of Yzerman, who is one of the 100 best players and one of the 20 best centres of all time is foolish. And even mentioning Sundin in the same breath as Mario Lemieux is ludicrous. Most of what you say is wrong, too: I've heard tales that Sundin didn't have a particularly good attitude as a youth playing in Quebec, certainly not any better than Mario's. Sundin was a very sporadic backchecker who's defensive game improved late in his career, but was never great. To say Sundin was "not as prolific offensively" as Lemieux is a ridiculous understatement. You could at least bring up Sundin's international play with Sweden as an argument (though it's not any better than Lemieux's work with Team Canada). Face it: There is no anti-Toronto bias in the HHOF. Sundin and Gilmour are just very good players who are on the bubble to make the Hall. If anything, the Hall should be biased towards Toronto players. Since they're based in the city, it might increase their attendance.
Dan
Wed, Nov 11, 09 at 12:30 PM
I will stick by what I have been saying all along...If people like Brooks, Vladislav Tretiak, can be in the Hall, why can't Gilmour,Henderson and eventually Sundin? What do all thos players have in common? There best work was in Toronto...fact. Another fact is that people hate Toronto and would do anything to stick it to us. I agree with what you say about Lemieux and Yzerman, but I see it differently on Brooks.
Dan
Wed, Nov 11, 09 at 01:27 PM
Compare Paul Henderson, Vladislav Tretiak and Herb Brooks and tell me why Henderson is not in the Hall. You say with Henderson it would have to come down to what he did in the NHL, and not representing his country. Why does that not apply to Tretiak and Brooks? It just sounds like politics to me. Henderson has made a huge difference in the lives of young people, even to this day...and he touched every Canadian while representing his country...plus he had a solid NHL career. I'm not sying Brooks wern't nice people who did some good work for their countries..but Henderson should be there without question.
Kyle
Wed, Nov 11, 09 at 03:37 PM
I agree no Leafs are getting in and I don't count Jim Gregory who is probably marginal anyway. Face the truth everyone, Gary Bettman will be in the Hall of fame before any Leafs will get a sniff, guaranteed. Bettman will be in and Gilmour will not and that is the ridiculous truth.
Brian P
Thu, Nov 12, 09 at 05:58 AM
Dan, you're reading me wrong. I said if Henderson ever makes the Hall it'll be because of that one tournament, not because of his NHL career. So proof of your Leaf bias is that Henderson, Gilmour and Sundin aren't in the Hall? Face it: the reason Henderson isn't in the Hall (and to be honest, I kind of agree with you on Henderson and think he should be) is because he was part of one of the greatest moments in Canadian hockey history, but overall had a middling NHL career. No one even remember that Henderson played for the Maple Leafs. Not an anti-Leaf bias. The reason Gilmour isn't in the Hall is because he was good, not great, not better than any of the guys who've been inducted before him since he retired, and it doesn't help that he was in trouble with the law earlier in his career, which has always affected the Hall's judgement of players (even though you could argue a lot of owners they inducted as builders were criminals). Not an anti-Leaf bias. Sundin isn't even eligible for induction yet, and your previous argument that they should waive the 3-year waiting period for him is ridiculous because a) they've only ever done that for the best of the best, i.e. Gretzky, Lemieux, Howe, etc., a group Sundin is by any kind of reasonable standard not a part of, and b) after Gretzky they said they were never going to waive the waiting period again. Not an anti-Leaf bias.
Add Your Comment
 
Your Name
 
Your Comment
 
 
The Rules:
 
Keep it clean, and stay on the subject or we might delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. You must have a javascript enabled browser to submit a comment.
 
 
 

More From Faceoff

The Boston Bruins are among 6 NHL teams that will open the 2010-11 regular season with games in Europe.

Six NHL teams to open season in Europe

A record six teams will open the 2010-11 National Hockey League...

 
Montreal Canadiens defenceman Marc- Andre Bergeron was hit in the leg with a shot February 4.

Habs’ Bergeron out for up to eight weeks

Montreal Canadiens defenceman Marc-Andre Bergeron wasn’t at ...

 
 
 
 

Top Columns

Bob Gainey during press conference where he was replace as GM of the Habs on Monday February 08, 2010.

Gainey defined team-first mentality

The new-team smell had faded by early 2003 when George Gillett...

 

Revealing look at Team Canada

Don Metz's terrific behind-the-scenes Canadian Olympic hockey...