Canucks set off on bold, uncertain new direction

Iain macIntyre, Vancouver Sun

Published: Wednesday, April 23, 2008

See, it makes perfect sense.

ARTICLE TOOLS

Font:
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Mike Gillis. Of course.

Vancouver Canucks owner Francesco Aquilini's firing last week of general manager Dave Nonis wasn't about leadership or sustainability or even winning, although no hockey boss in this town can dodge that requirement. It was about getting his own guy, having a general manager of his choosing to run the organization the way ownership envisions.

So Francesco and Roberto and Paulo hired Gillis. They have their man.

And he is a bright, aggressive, successful player agent who has never made a trade, never drafted a player, never worked in management or built a hockey department or done anything for a National Hockey League team except play.

This isn't to say Gillis won't be a good general manager for the Canucks. But he is certainly not a mainstream pick and represents a bold -- and uncertain -- new direction for an organization still trying to win its first Stanley Cup 38 years after joining the NHL.

Asked a week ago Tuesday whether his new general manager would have GM experience, Aquilini said: "Absolutely. I mean, to have that experience in hockey, that's for sure. They'd have to have extensive experience and really understand the game."

The owner might like a mulligan on that press conference.

The message should have been: Nonis did a good job positioning the Canucks for success, but the team needs a new man for the final stage of building a winner, someone to go boldly into the trade and free-agent markets to get the few vital missing pieces.

I disagree. But you can sell that message.

Surely, this will be Gillis's mandate, to find those pieces.

And, surely, he was the guy Aquilini had in mind all along.

In eight days -- the time between news breaking of Nonis's dismissal and Gillis's hiring -- an NHL organization cannot go out and thoroughly investigate, identify and interview all the best candidates for the general manager's job.

Anaheim hockey executives Bob Murray and David McNab couldn't have been interviewed, Detroit assistant Jim Nill not legally contacted and asked about his interest in the job.

No, Gillis was the Aquilinis' guy all along. Much of the evidence can be found in Francesco's inner counsel, which includes ex-Canuck Geoff Courtnall, close friends with the owner and the new general manager.

And there's nothing wrong with having your guy. Most teams, in fact, can't function without a cohesiveness and uniformity in beliefs from the top down. But everyone in the Canuck organization except Aquilini believed in Nonis and what he was doing, and that now becomes a serious dilemma for Gillis.

Presumably, there are profound personnel changes ahead for the Canucks, beginning with the coaching staff and the senior people in hockey operations. Or else why hire a GM who represents a seismic shift in thinking for the franchise?

But here is where Gillis seems a risky pick, and an unpopular one according to a TEAM radio poll Tuesday night that showed three-quarters of respondents initially opposed to the hiring.

 
 
 
 
 

your comments
Brian Butcher
Wed, Apr 23, 08 at 12:07 PM
Is this new guy actually the resurrection of former coach LaForge?
Ben
Wed, Apr 23, 08 at 12:43 PM
macintyre I'm sick of you and all the other vancouver media's manlove for Dave Nonis. He had never made a trade either when he was hired, he was a rookie GM as well. In 3 years Nonis made 2 significant moves, trading for Luongo and signing Willie Mitchell. I'm being generous with Mitchell because multiple time all star, game breaker Ed Jovanovski walked out the door for nothing in the process. Nonis did nothing in 3 years to address how offensively challenged this squad was, that alone is grounds to be fired in my book. 2 YEARS! don't give me this build from the goalie out crap, you can upgrade more than one aspect of your team in a year,let alone 2, the salary cap doesn't change that much from year to year. Gillis may not have been my first choice but on the plus side as a player agent he is used to playing hardball with league GM's and should have a good repore with players. Nonis had to go because he failed to adequately address his team's needs in turn hanging the only significant player he added to the team out ot dry on a nightly basis. One year is excusable, two years is not. So end your Dave Nonis love affair.
jaboo
Wed, Apr 23, 08 at 12:43 PM
I would like to see the new gm add some toughness to the team. Im tired of watching this squad getting slapped around' cowan is no heavyweight, the sedins are scared of the corners,whats the use of having salo if he's afraid to use his shot.edler is soft,bieksa is the only defenseman with real grit,the idea of going after more soft swedes Is the wrong direction. hoping for A stronger future; go canucks
Hal
Wed, Apr 23, 08 at 03:58 PM
Aquilini and Gillis both with material memory lapses ("It's been reported recently that Gillis actually turned down the gig,") Aweel ,maybe in the Canuck's version of The Emperor's New Clothes", the organisation will dispense with the team and games and just provide the fans with their play-by-play of the fabulous virtual hockey season. Might I suggest a switch of venues? GM Place for the Giants this fall, and the Canucks in the Colisuem.
Howard
Wed, Apr 23, 08 at 04:14 PM
Seen it all before. Like 38 years worth. The more things change the more they stay the same. Bring on football season.!!!!!!
paul
Wed, Apr 23, 08 at 04:17 PM
The Mike Gillis photo that is shown in the media looks like one who is a hard drinker. The flushed face with puffy eyes, but maybe you should be familiar with the drink when taking the Canucks GM job. And if you are not a boozer when you start, you probably will be by the time your career here is over. Good luck Mike......you'll need it!
Yammer
Wed, Apr 23, 08 at 04:32 PM
The piteous cries continue, despite the glee that must be felt in the toy departments of media all over the city, otherwise bereft of Canucks news.
al
Wed, Apr 23, 08 at 05:15 PM
talk about pulling names ..courtnall, I'm sure Tigers in their somewhere and Stan and all of a sudden it does make sense. The owner wants his guy and now he's got it.
Mike
Wed, Apr 23, 08 at 10:47 PM
Well, the new GM has passed the first test. In his first round of media contact, he has been very articulate and left no doubt that he has his opinions on the state of the Canucks franchise and how to improve it. He appears to have the experience needed to judge hockey talent and to negotiate deals - valuable skills for a GM to possess. Aquilini's hire comes only nine days after firing Nonis with no eveidence reported by the press that the final selection was the result of a comprehensive search process. Why no display of a search - at least we would have thought there was a deliberate process. Were there clandestine discussions in the weeks leading up to driving Nonis to the airport? If so, how did Aquilini arrive at his choice of Gillis? The GM decision had to be made quickly as we could ill-afford to have a tentative management going into the critical summertime period following July 1. The decision to hire Gillis was the one a lot of observers thought would be made. Did our speculations help make Aquilini's decision for him? Every time a change like this is made, the initial press conferences sound good, and we are all filled with hope for the future. Over the history of this organization, we have had well-known hockey types and our share of "Joe-Who's", all with similar disappointing ends after the passage of the required number of years. Let's wish the new GM well and hope this time it's different and that the changes that are eventually made will actually put Vancouver on a championship track for the first time in its history. Too many things are new and the jury must remain out for at least a year. For what it's worth, I wouldn't have done any of this. Nonis needed the next year to bring HIS plans to fruition, and it appears he had Aquilini's backing right up until the end of this season. In that regard, Nonis' players really let him down by rolling over like bleating lambs at the end of the season, but who knew? There is an element of fickleness running through all this.
John L.
Wed, Apr 23, 08 at 11:43 PM
Welcome Mike G. I hope you're ready for a bumpy ride in the coming weeks and months. I hope as well as that you are given a fair chance to make this club into the winner it's so rarely been. The man you replaced has left you with some tools to make things a little easier, but also some challenges that may cause considerable headaches. Unfortunately he wasn't given the opportunity to redeem his indecisive ways of the last 18 months. Be warned that if things begin to go south "YOU WILL BE EATEN ALIVE!". That's what the fans and media surrounding this team do.
Add Your Comment
 
Your Name
 
Your Comment
 
 
The Rules:
 
Keep it clean, and stay on the subject or we might delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. You must have a javascript enabled browser to submit a comment.
 
 
 

Who is Canada's biggest threat?

Dave Waddell and Elliott Pap go head2head.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

past head2head

 

Debating the deals

Wayne Scanlan and George Johnson go head2head.

 

Canadiens goalie situation...

Dave Stubbs and Pat Hickey go head2head.

 

Two views on head injuries...

Cam Cole and John MacKinnon go head2head.